Overview
This page covers ashwagandha, the root and root extracts of Withania somnifera. It describes the plant's place in Ayurveda, how the name is used for supplements, what systematic reviews and trials have reported for stress, sleep, hormones and strength, and what case reports say about liver and thyroid effects, interactions and pregnancy.
Where does Ashwagandha come from?
Place in Ayurveda
A 2023 narrative review states that the root of Withania somnifera is the part used in medicine and that the name ashwagandha comes from ashwa, meaning horse, and gandha, meaning fragrance, referring to the smell of the fresh root. The review describes traditional use as a substance that strengthens the nervous system and links it to the Ayurvedic category of rasayana, and it says use in traditional Indian medicine dates back nearly 3000 years. That date is the review's own general statement and was not checked against primary texts.
The same review lists traditional uses of the root as an aphrodisiac, narcotic, tonic, diuretic, anthelmintic and stimulant. The US National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) likewise says the plant has been used as a medicinal plant for thousands of years, especially in Ayurvedic medicine. The Machipedia pages on Ayurveda, Ayurvedic Herbal Medicine and Rasayana Therapy describe the wider system, and neither source reviewed here dates specific classical texts.
Spread and modern supplement use
NCCIH describes ashwagandha as an evergreen shrub from parts of India, Africa and the Middle East, and says that supplements typically use the root, the leaf or an extract of either. The narrative review adds that the plant is cultivated beyond India, including in Mediterranean countries, the Himalayan region, Africa and Australia.
Modern trials often test branded, standardized root extracts. Examples named in trial titles and abstracts include Shoden and Witholytin. These are product names used by the research teams, and results for one named extract should not be assumed to apply to another product, to raw root powder or to traditional preparations. The Machipedia pages on Herbal Medicine and Dietary Supplements cover the broader categories.
What do the names and terms mean?
Names and the botanical species
Ashwagandha is the Sanskrit-derived name used in Ayurveda for Withania somnifera. NCCIH lists Indian ginseng as another common name, and the 2023 narrative review also uses Indian winter cherry. Systematic reviews generally search under ashwagandha, Withania somnifera or both, so these terms refer to the same plant in the sources reviewed.
Adaptogen and rasayana
Several reviews call ashwagandha an adaptogen or anti-stress agent. A 2021 meta-analysis on physical performance describes it as a potent adaptogen, and a 2024 meta-analysis calls it an adaptogenic herb used for psychosomatic disorders. Adaptogen is a modern label used by researchers and marketers and is not a regulatory or classical Ayurvedic category. Rasayana is the Ayurvedic term the narrative review applies to the plant's traditional role, and the Machipedia page on Rasayana Therapy explains the concept.
Root, leaf and extract
Product labels and trial reports use ashwagandha for raw root powder, root extracts, leaf extracts and mixed root and leaf extracts. NCCIH notes that many studies are small and use different preparations. For that reason, a statement about ashwagandha in one trial applies strictly to the preparation that trial tested.
What does Ashwagandha involve?
Forms in which it is used
Sources describe ashwagandha taken by mouth as root powder, root extract or leaf extract, usually as a supplement. NCCIH says it contains withanolides, compounds associated in laboratory work with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects. This page gives no doses, product choices or preparation steps, because the sources reviewed describe studied amounts for research purposes only and not individual use.
How trials have used it
Trials cited on this page lasted from about two months to six months. A 60-day randomized trial in stressed adults and a 12-week randomized trial in overweight adults with stress and fatigue each compared a standardized extract with placebo. Duration matters for interpretation, because NCCIH states that long-term safety is not established, and most trials ran for only a few weeks to months.
What is Ashwagandha used for?
Traditional and popular uses
The narrative review reports a wide range of claimed or studied uses: neuroprotective, sedative and adaptogenic effects, effects on sleep, anti-inflammatory and anti-diabetic properties, and reproductive outcomes. NCCIH lists stress, insomnia, anxiety, testosterone and sperm quality, asthma, athletic performance, cognitive function, diabetes, menopause and female infertility among the uses it addresses.
Thyroid and other claims
The narrative review includes ashwagandha as a possible treatment for hypothyroidism, citing laboratory and animal work, and an animal study in rats with chemically induced hypothyroidism reported improved thyroid hormone measures. These findings are not human trials, and a case report described later on this page documents thyrotoxicosis in a person who used the extract for hypothyroidism. NCCIH states that evidence is not enough for several other claimed uses and that promotion for COVID-19 lacks high-quality support.
What does the research show?
Stress and anxiety
A 2014 systematic review (Pratte and colleagues) screened 62 abstracts and included five human trials. All five reported greater improvement on anxiety or stress scales with ashwagandha than with a comparator, but all had unclear or high risk of bias and heterogeneous designs prevented pooling. A 2022 meta-analysis (Akhgarjand and colleagues) of 12 randomized trials with 1,002 participants reported lower anxiety and stress than placebo, with very high heterogeneity and low certainty of evidence for both outcomes.
A 2024 meta-analysis of nine randomized trials in 558 people reported lower scores on the Perceived Stress Scale, the Hamilton Anxiety Scale and serum cortisol than placebo, and four trials reported mild to moderate adverse events. A 12-week trial of an extract in overweight adults with high stress did not find a stress difference from placebo on its primary measure. NCCIH summarizes the evidence as suggesting some preparations may help stress, with evidence for anxiety unclear.
Sleep
A 2021 systematic review and meta-analysis (Cheah and colleagues) pooled five randomized trials with 400 participants and reported a small but significant effect of ashwagandha extract on overall sleep versus placebo, with larger effects in adults diagnosed with insomnia. The authors reported no serious side effects but noted that safety data are limited. The Machipedia page on Melatonin covers another widely used sleep supplement and should not be read as evidence about ashwagandha.
Testosterone, fertility and muscle strength
A 2026 meta-analysis of 20 randomized trials with 1,249 participants reported higher testosterone and muscle strength with ashwagandha, with strength gains seen in physically active people but not in untrained or special populations. A 2021 Bayesian meta-analysis of 13 trials in healthy people reported better physical performance outcomes than placebo and called for more studies in athletic populations. A 2018 systematic review of male infertility found four clinical trials, only one randomized, and concluded that the data were too limited to give robust evidence.
Individual trials are mixed. A 16-week crossover trial in aging, overweight men reported higher testosterone and DHEA-S than placebo but no significant between-group differences in fatigue or vigor, and a 60-day trial found the testosterone change in males did not differ significantly from placebo. NCCIH states that limited evidence suggests testosterone may rise and sperm quality improve over 2 to 4 months.
Quality of the evidence
Across the reviews, the main limits are small trials, short follow-up, differing extracts and very high heterogeneity. Several trials test branded extracts. Funding sources were not examined for this page, so industry sponsorship of individual trials is not assessed here. No source reviewed documents long-term outcomes beyond several months.
What are the safety considerations?
Liver injury
A 2020 case series (Björnsson and colleagues) described five people with liver injury attributed to ashwagandha-containing supplements, three in Iceland and two from the US Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network. All developed jaundice after 2 to 12 weeks, the injury was cholestatic or mixed, none developed liver failure, and liver tests normalized within 1 to 5 months in four patients while one was lost to follow-up. Chemical analysis confirmed ashwagandha in available supplements and found no other toxic compounds, though four people also took other supplements.
NCCIH states that liver injury is rare but that a number of cases have been linked to ashwagandha supplements. A 2025 review of safety as a food additive reports multiple cases of liver damage and recommends stronger label warnings. The NIH LiverTox classification could not be opened for this page and is not reported here.
Thyroid, hormones and interactions
A 2022 case report described a 73-year-old woman with supraventricular tachycardia, symptoms of hyperthyroidism and low TSH after two years of self-treating hypothyroidism with ashwagandha root extract; symptoms and blood tests resolved after she stopped it. A single case cannot show how often this occurs. The 2025 review names people with thyroid disorders as a group at risk, and NCCIH advises against use by people with thyroid or autoimmune disorders and before surgery.
NCCIH lists possible interactions with diabetes and blood pressure medicines, immunosuppressants, sedatives, anticonvulsants and thyroid hormone medicines, and advises people with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer to avoid it because it may raise testosterone. The narrative review describes additive effects with benzodiazepines and barbiturates. A 2026 critical review of adverse effects also reports gastrointestinal effects, immune hypersensitivity and endocrine effects, and calls for better pharmacovigilance.
Pregnancy, quality and who should ask a clinician
NCCIH advises avoiding ashwagandha during pregnancy and breastfeeding. The narrative review states that higher doses of root extract can lead to miscarriage, and the 2025 review lists pregnant women among populations at significant risk. The sources reviewed do not describe traditional abortifacient use in detail, so that claim is not made here.
NCCIH notes that the US FDA does not approve dietary supplements before sale and that manufacturers are responsible for safety and labeling. The sources reviewed contain no verified information on quality testing or adulteration of ashwagandha products or on any national ban, so none is reported. Anyone with liver, thyroid or autoimmune conditions, who is pregnant, or who takes prescription medicines should ask a clinician or pharmacist before using it, and it should not replace necessary care.
Connected Entries
Showing 8 of 29 related records.
Classification and context
- Entry type
- Modality
- Practice type
- Herbal remedy and dietary supplement from Ayurveda
- Traditions
- Ayurveda
- Concepts
- Adaptogen, Rasayana
- Categories
- Complementary
Sources and discovery context
Research and public-health sources support evidence and safety context. Directory and discovery sources describe navigation, relationships, practitioners, and access—not clinical efficacy.
Federal summary stating that evidence is mixed and that liver injury is rare but reported.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Plain-language summary of uses, evidence, side effects, liver, pregnancy and interactions; does not discuss product quality; must not be read as endorsement.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins, Terminology, Practice Description, Claimed Uses, Research and Evidence, Safety and Suitability
Narrative review summarizing traditional use, claimed benefits and contraindications.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports naming, traditional-use description and cautions; its roughly 3000-year date and benefit statements are general and not primary-source dating or trial evidence.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins, Terminology, Claimed Uses, Safety and Suitability
Pooled 12 trials and rated certainty low for both outcomes.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports pooled findings for stress and anxiety with low certainty; must not be generalized to clinical anxiety disorders.
- Supports sections
- Research and Evidence
Found five trials, all at unclear or high risk of bias, and could not pool them.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports five small trials with unclear or high bias; cannot support efficacy claims.
- Supports sections
- Research and Evidence
Nine trials, 558 patients, with four trials reporting mild to moderate adverse events.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports pooled scale and cortisol findings and adverse-event note; not long-term safety.
- Supports sections
- Terminology, Research and Evidence
Five randomized trials with 400 participants reported a small sleep effect versus placebo.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports small pooled sleep effect from five trials; not evidence for long-term use.
- Supports sections
- Research and Evidence
Twenty trials with 1,249 participants; strength gains limited to physically active subgroups.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports pooled testosterone and strength findings; cannot show health benefit of higher testosterone.
- Supports sections
- Research and Evidence
Thirteen trials in healthy people, with authors calling for more athletic-population studies.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports performance findings in healthy people with low to moderate bias; not applicable to patients.
- Supports sections
- Terminology, Research and Evidence
Found four trials, one randomized, and judged the data too limited for robust conclusions.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports statement that only one randomized trial existed and data were limited; must not support fertility claims.
- Supports sections
- Research and Evidence
Reported lower anxiety scores and cortisol with the extract and a non-significant testosterone difference versus placebo.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports a 60-day trial of one named extract in 60 stressed adults; not generalizable to other products.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins, Practice Description, Research and Evidence
Primary stress outcome showed no between-group difference, with secondary fatigue and hormone findings.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports a 12-week trial in overweight adults where the primary stress outcome did not differ from placebo; one named extract only.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins, Practice Description, Research and Evidence
Five cases of cholestatic or mixed liver injury, self-limited in those with follow-up.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports five described cases; cannot estimate frequency of liver injury.
- Supports sections
- Safety and Suitability
One patient developed thyrotoxicosis after long use, with resolution after stopping.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports one reported case; cannot establish frequency or causation in general.
- Supports sections
- Claimed Uses, Safety and Suitability
Review naming pregnant women, people with thyroid disorders and people with liver or kidney dysfunction as at-risk groups.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports reviewers' conclusions about at-risk groups and liver cases; reviewers' recommendations are not regulatory positions.
- Supports sections
- Safety and Suitability
Reviews gastrointestinal, immune, liver and endocrine effects and drug interactions.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports the listed categories of reported adverse effects and the call for pharmacovigilance; no frequencies taken.
- Supports sections
- Safety and Suitability