Overview
This page describes New Thought as a family of related American religious and mental-healing groups: the Quimby background, Christian Science as a distinct church, and the Unity, Divine Science and Religious Science branches. It covers terms, organization, what adherents claim, what scholarship and psychology research say, and where care is needed.
Where does New Thought come from?
Quimby and mind-based healing in Maine
Phineas Parkhurst Quimby was born in Lebanon, New Hampshire, in 1802, grew up in Belfast, Maine, and died there on January 16, 1866. A biographical sketch published in 1895 reports that he began experimenting with mesmerism around 1838, then concluded that a mesmerized subject's diagnoses reflected what the patient or bystanders already believed. He gave up mesmerism and relied on conversation and explanation, and practiced in Portland from 1859.
Quimby is described in these sources as holding that disease was an error of belief rather than an independent reality, summed up in a phrase quoted by his editor: disease is a deranged state of mind whose cause lies in belief. Both sources were produced by members of the Dresser family, who were followers of Quimby, so their account of his teaching and of his influence on others is partisan and should be weighed accordingly.
Eddy and the founding of Christian Science
Mary Baker Eddy visited Quimby's Portland clinic in 1862. After a fall in 1866 she credited Bible reading and spiritual insight for her recovery, which the church dates as the discovery of Christian Science. Her textbook Science and Health appeared in 1875, a church was organized in Boston in 1879, and the Christian Science Monitor followed in 1908.
Whether Eddy drew on Quimby has been disputed since 1883, when Julius Dresser and another former associate argued that Quimby was the true founder. One reference entry treats the question as controversial and argues that Quimby's methods rested on mesmerism while Eddy's rested on Christianity. A research overview likewise presents Christian Science as a distinct religion that shared roots in mental healing.
Hopkins and the later branches
Emma Curtis Hopkins, described as one of Eddy's most promising students, left in 1884 and became a founder of what came to be called New Thought. Her students included Malinda Cramer, who founded the Home College of Divine Science in San Francisco in 1888 and the International Divine Science Association in 1892, and Ernest Holmes, who published The Science of Mind in 1926 and founded an institute in 1927.
Unity describes its own founding as taking place in Kansas City, Missouri, in 1889, when Charles and Myrtle Fillmore began publishing after Myrtle Fillmore reported using prayer and affirmations in relation to long-term ailments. Unity's archive page describes the movement as growing out of New Thought, which it calls a successor to Transcendentalism. These are the movement's own accounts and are not independent verification of the healing claims.
Organization and consolidation
Religious Science developed a denomination in 1949, with later organizational branches in 1953 to 1954, 1972 and the 1990s, before the two main branches reunited in 2012 as the Centers for Spiritual Living. The sources reviewed do not give a founding date for the International New Thought Alliance, so its early history is not described here.
What do the names and terms mean?
New Thought as an umbrella name
New Thought is described as a mental-healing movement that began in the United States in the 1800s, and a research overview states that Religious Science grew out of it. The label covers separate organizations rather than a single church, and the sources reviewed do not date when the name itself came into use, so no date is given here.
The International New Thought Alliance, which describes itself as incorporated in the District of Columbia as a religious not-for-profit organization, publishes a Declaration of Principles. That document is one body's statement of shared belief, and the branches differ in vocabulary and polity.
Christian Science compared with New Thought
Christian Science is a separate church with its own textbook and structure. A research overview describes it as a distinct religion whose adherents hold that reality is wholly spiritual, that God as divine Mind cannot create evil or matter, and that disease arises from a false belief in a material universe. The same source distinguishes it from the broader mind-over-matter approach sometimes called Quimbyism.
Eddy and her followers are not described in the sources reviewed as part of the later New Thought organizations. The reference entry instead records that former students who left her movement became leaders in New Thought, which makes the relationship one of common roots and later separation.
Terms used by the branches
Religious Science uses the name Science of Mind for its core text and philosophy, and its practitioners offer what it calls Spiritual Mind Treatment, a form of affirmative prayer. Unity speaks of affirmations and the creative power of thoughts among its Five Principles. Divine Science is used by a separate line of churches, one of which describes God as the nature of all being.
How is New Thought applied in practice?
How the branches are organized
Unity describes more than 600 study groups and churches that grew from the Fillmores' students, with headquarters at Unity Village, Missouri, which was incorporated in 1953. The Centers for Spiritual Living describes more than 400 spiritual communities in 30 countries, teaching a New Thought philosophy based on Science of Mind.
Divine Science is represented in the sources reviewed by one local church, which gives its own account of the movement's founding by Nona Brooks and others in 1887 and the incorporation of a Denver college in 1898, and which offers a course of study. The Centers for Spiritual Living operates a School of Spiritual Leadership whose graduates earn the title Science of Mind and Spirit Minister. The sources reviewed describe no independent accreditation of these titles.
Practices associated with the movement
Adherents describe prayer, meditation, affirmative prayer and Spiritual Mind Treatment as central. In Religious Science, Spiritual Mind Treatment is described as having five named stages, and practitioners and ministers give treatments and guide others. Healing practices are said to include prayer, meditation and traditional medicine, which means that at least one branch describes its practice as used alongside conventional care.
Machipedia has practice pages tagged as connected to this tradition, including Manifestation and Numerology. The sources reviewed for this page document the movement's affirmation and prayer practices but do not document a link between New Thought and numerology.
What is New Thought used for?
Healing, prosperity and harmony
The Declaration of Principles states that people are spiritual beings in a spiritual universe governed by spiritual law, through which healing, prosperity and harmony are possible, and that mental states shape lived experience. Unity's own pages describe the power of thought and prayer to bring about healing, including mind over body. These are statements of belief by the organizations.
Religious Science teaches that positive thought and affirmative prayer promote healing and a full, harmonious life. A Divine Science church states that all change starts in the mind and shows up as personal experience through cause and effect, and that prayer is about accepting what is already given rather than asking for more.
Spiritual purposes
Beyond health and prosperity, the Declaration of Principles lists unconditional love, service and peace as the highest expression of spiritual principles, and holds that the kingdom of heaven can be realized in the present. Unity and the Centers for Spiritual Living describe themselves as drawing on teachings from many faiths and as welcoming people of all paths.
What does the research show?
Historical scholarship
The origin of Christian Science and its relation to Quimby remain debated in the sources reviewed, with partisan accounts on both sides and reference works treating the question as unsettled. The sources here do not provide a scholarly study of New Thought as a whole, such as a sociological survey of membership or a history of the name, so those topics are not covered.
Clinical research on the movement
No controlled study of New Thought healing, affirmative prayer as taught by these groups, or the law of attraction was found. Web searches for randomized trials of New Thought, the law of attraction and manifestation returned none, and direct searches of the medical literature database could not be completed in this review. Absence of studies is not evidence of effect or of harm.
Related findings in psychology
A 2009 set of experiments by Wood and colleagues tested repeating a positive self-statement, such as a person describing themselves as lovable. Participants with low self-esteem felt worse after repeating it or thinking about how it was true than those who did neither, while participants with high self-esteem felt somewhat better, though the benefit was limited. Only the abstract was read for this review.
Self-affirmation research is a separate topic, in which people reflect on personal values. In one imaging study of sedentary adults, 67 adults were reported, and those who affirmed their top-ranked value showed more activity in reward-related brain regions than controls. The authors note a small sample, confounding with value content and the need for further between-subjects work, and the study does not test New Thought affirmations.
A review by Oettingen and Schwörer reports that simply fantasizing about a desired future leads to weak problem solving and little change, whereas mental contrasting, which pairs the desired future with obstacles, leads to better problem solving. This research concerns goal setting and does not evaluate the claim that thought shapes external events.
What are the safety considerations?
Reliance on prayer instead of medical care
A 1998 review in Pediatrics examined deaths of children in families that used faith healing instead of medical care. It included 172 children who died between 1975 and 1995, estimated that 140 had more than 90 percent expected survival with medical care, and concluded that preventable deaths were substantial. The abstract concerns faith healing in general and does not name denominations, so it should not be attributed to any group named on this page.
A research overview of Christian Science states that its members are accepted as having the right to refuse treatment for themselves and that disputes over parents declining medical care for children remain a major concern. By contrast, Religious Science is described as including traditional medicine among its healing practices. The sources reviewed do not report harms specific to Unity or Divine Science.
Psychological cautions
The experiments on positive self-statements found that people with low self-esteem felt worse after repeating them. That result concerns one lab task and does not show that prayer or affirmations taught in religious settings have the same effect, but it supports caution for anyone who is distressed. Anyone with a medical or mental health condition may wish to continue care alongside spiritual practice and not delay it.
Training and cultural attribution
No sources reviewed report cost, coercion or abuse in connection with these groups, and that absence is not evidence either way. Unity and the Centers for Spiritual Living describe drawing on teachings from many faith traditions, and the sources reviewed do not document how those teachings were adopted. Each organization speaks only for its own members, and the International New Thought Alliance's declaration is a statement of one body.
Connected Entries
Showing 8 of 20 related records.
Classification and context
- Entry type
- Tradition
- Practice type
- Tradition: American mental-healing and metaphysical religious movement
- Traditions
- Not assigned
- Concepts
- Affirmative prayer, Mind cure, Spiritual Mind Treatment, Power of thought, Science of Mind, Divine Science, Unity, Prosperity, Oneness of God and humanity, Spiritual law
- Categories
- Metaphysical
Sources and discovery context
Research and public-health sources support evidence and safety context. Directory and discovery sources describe navigation, relationships, practitioners, and access—not clinical efficacy.
Editor's introduction and Quimby's own writings, presented to argue Quimby's priority over Eddy.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports Quimby's dates, locations and his stated view of disease as error of belief. Must not be used to settle the Quimby-Eddy dispute.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins, Research and Evidence
Early sketch of Quimby's life written by a member of his circle.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports biographical details and Quimby's move away from mesmerism. Not independent.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins
Summarizes Eddy's life, the Quimby dispute and former students who joined New Thought.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports Eddy dates, the Quimby controversy and Hopkins leaving in 1884. Must not be read as resolving the controversy.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins, Terminology, Research and Evidence
Presents Christian Science as a distinct religion with roots in mental healing and notes ongoing disputes over children's care.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports dates, beliefs and the distinction from Quimbyism. Does not quantify harms.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins, Terminology, Safety and Suitability
Outlines Holmes, the Science of Mind text, branch history to the 2012 reunion and Spiritual Mind Treatment.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports Holmes dates, organizational history and stated beliefs. Does not evaluate outcomes.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins, Terminology, Practice Description, Claimed Uses, Research and Evidence, Safety and Suitability
Gives dates for Cramer's Home College and the International Divine Science Association.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports Cramer's study with Hopkins and the 1888 and 1892 Divine Science dates.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins
Gives Unity's 1889 founding account, Unity Village and the Five Principles.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports Unity's own account of its founding and its Five Principles. Self-report only.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins, Terminology, Practice Description, Claimed Uses, Safety and Suitability
Describes Unity's origin in New Thought and its teachings on thought and prayer.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports Unity's statement that it grew out of New Thought and its stated teachings. Self-report only.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins, Claimed Uses
Publishes the Declaration of Principles, defines New Thought as an umbrella term and describes the Alliance as a religious not-for-profit.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports the Alliance's stated principles and legal form. Does not give history.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins, Terminology, Claimed Uses, Safety and Suitability
Describes more than 400 communities in 30 countries, Science of Mind teaching and cause and effect.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports the network size claim and Science of Mind description. Self-report only.
- Supports sections
- Practice Description, Claimed Uses, Safety and Suitability
Gives the church's account of Divine Science's founding, the Denver college and its local teaching.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports one church's description of Divine Science. Must not be taken as the federation's position.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins, Terminology, Practice Description, Claimed Uses
Reports that low self-esteem participants felt worse after repeating a positive self-statement.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports abstract-level findings for one self-statement in lab settings. Must not be extended to religious affirmative prayer.
- Supports sections
- Research and Evidence, Safety and Suitability
Compares affirmed and control participants using fMRI and a follow-up of sedentary behavior.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports brain-activity findings for value affirmation in sedentary adults. Not a test of New Thought affirmations or of outcomes.
- Supports sections
- Research and Evidence
Contrasts simple future fantasy with mental contrasting in behavior change.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports the abstract statement that simple fantasizing leads to weak problem solving. Does not test the law of attraction.
- Supports sections
- Research and Evidence
Reviews 172 child deaths and estimates which were likely preventable with medical care.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports the authors' estimates for faith healing in general. Must not be attributed to a specific group.
- Supports sections
- Safety and Suitability