Overview
This page covers the history and terminology of orthomolecular medicine, including Linus Pauling's 1968 paper on orthomolecular psychiatry and the later use of the term by advocacy bodies. It sets out what the movement says the approach involves, what trials and reviews of vitamin C, antioxidants and B vitamins have found, the harms that sources report, and what the sources reviewed do not cover.
Where does Orthomolecular Medicine come from?
Pauling's 1968 paper
The International Society for Orthomolecular Medicine credits the chemist Linus Pauling with coining the term orthomolecular, and lists his 1968 Science article, 'Orthomolecular psychiatry', as further reading. The abstract of that paper proposes that brain function is affected by the molecular concentrations of substances normally present in the brain, that the optimum concentrations for a person may differ from those supplied by the normal diet and genetic machinery, and that orthomolecular therapy may be the preferred treatment for many mentally ill patients.
The abstract also suggests that the postulated gene for schizophrenia might itself be a gene leading to a localized cerebral deficiency in one or more vital substances. The abstract presents this as a suggestion by the author. It describes a hypothesis, not a tested finding.
From psychiatry to general medicine
The Linus Pauling Institute at Oregon State University says Pauling later broadened the idea into orthomolecular medicine, an approach to preventing and treating disease with nutrients such as vitamins, minerals and amino acids, and glosses the term as the right molecules in the right concentration. The Institute says he saw it as a complement to standard medical care rather than a replacement. Its biography also describes research with Abram Hoffer on vitamins in cancer and says Pauling became convinced that vitamin C helped with cancer, influenza and other conditions.
A Cochrane review of vitamin B6 and magnesium in autism states that mega-vitamin intervention began in the 1950s with the treatment of people with schizophrenia, and that vitamin B6 was later tried in children described as having autism after speech and language improvement was observed in some of them. The review reports this as background and does not itself test the 1950s work.
Later organizations and news service
The International Society for Orthomolecular Medicine and the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service now carry the term. The news service describes itself as a wire-service style news feed for press, radio and television, published by an editorial board of physicians and scientists. A 2005 release lists Abram Hoffer as one of four editors. These are advocacy and information bodies of the movement, so their pages are used here to show how the movement describes itself and not as independent evidence.
What do the names and terms mean?
The term and its definitions
The Orthomolecular Medicine News Service attributes to Pauling the definition of orthomolecular medicine as the treatment of disease by the provision of the optimum molecular environment, specifying optimum concentrations of substances normally found in the body. The International Society for Orthomolecular Medicine describes it as using natural substances such as vitamins, minerals and amino acids to prevent and treat disease, supplying the right molecules in the right amounts.
Related names and neighboring Machipedia pages
Sources use several names for related ideas. Pauling's paper uses orthomolecular psychiatry and orthomolecular therapy, a 1984 case report is titled with the phrase megavitamin therapy, and the Cochrane review above uses mega-vitamin intervention. PubMed indexes the area under the heading Orthomolecular Therapy. These terms overlap but are not identical in scope, and the sources reviewed do not define a single agreed boundary.
Orthomolecular medicine is one framework for using supplements. The Machipedia page Dietary Supplements covers supplements as a product category and this page does not repeat it. Other related pages include Multivitamin Supplements, Nutritional Psychiatry, Nutritional Therapy, High-Dose Intravenous Vitamin C and Naturopathy. Findings on any of those pages should not be assumed to apply here, and the reverse also holds.
What does Orthomolecular Medicine involve?
What the movement says it involves
The International Society for Orthomolecular Medicine describes a practice that considers nutrients first in diagnosis and treatment, treats each person according to individual biochemistry, looks for root causes rather than only symptoms, and allows nutrient amounts above standard daily intake recommendations when therapeutic. It also says the approach assesses toxicity risk, uses the lowest effective drug dose when drugs are needed, and respects patient choice and informed consent. These are the society's own statements and have not been independently tested as a package. This page gives no doses or protocols.
Who delivers it
The sources reviewed do not describe a register, protected title, curriculum or training standard for orthomolecular practitioners, and the society page opened does not list one. A 1984 case report notes that ingesting large doses of vitamins was increasing in a considerable segment of the population, which suggests that self-directed use occurs alongside practitioner-led use. The sources do not say how common either is.
What is Orthomolecular Medicine used for?
Psychiatric conditions
Pauling's paper proposed orthomolecular therapy for many mentally ill patients and gave schizophrenia particular attention. The Cochrane review of vitamin B6 and magnesium notes that high-dose vitamin approaches were applied to schizophrenia from the 1950s and later to autism. These claims originated within the movement and are separate from the trial results summarized below.
Cancer, infection and general disease
The Linus Pauling Institute biography says Pauling came to hold that vitamin C helped with cancer and influenza. The movement's news service also publishes releases with strongly positive titles for individual nutrients, such as a 2005 release headed 'Vitamin E: Safe, Effective, and Heart-Healthy'. Such headings state the movement's position. They are not findings from the reviews summarized on this page, which reached different conclusions for some nutrients.
What does the research show?
Vitamin C in advanced cancer
Two randomized, double-blind trials from the Mayo Clinic group tested high-dose oral vitamin C against placebo. The 1979 trial in 150 patients with advanced cancer (60 evaluable on vitamin C, 63 on placebo) found no appreciable difference in symptoms, performance status, appetite, weight or survival, with median survival of about seven weeks. The 1985 trial in 100 patients with advanced colorectal cancer and no prior chemotherapy found no advantage over placebo for time to progression or survival, and the authors concluded that high-dose vitamin C was not effective against advanced malignant disease.
The National Cancer Institute summary notes that these were oral trials and that intravenous administration reaches much higher blood levels than oral dosing. It describes laboratory findings, mixed phase II results and limitations in trial rigor for the intravenous work. It says intravenous use is generally well tolerated in trials but is not established. That intravenous literature is treated on the Machipedia page High-Dose Intravenous Vitamin C, and the oral trial results should not be carried across to it, or the reverse.
Antioxidant supplements and mortality
A 2012 Cochrane review of 78 randomized trials with 296,707 participants assessed antioxidant supplements (beta-carotene, vitamin A, vitamin C, vitamin E and selenium) for preventing mortality. The authors found no evidence to support antioxidant supplements for primary or secondary prevention, and concluded that beta-carotene and vitamin E seem to increase mortality, as may higher doses of vitamin A. Vitamin C and selenium showed no significant effect on mortality in low-bias trials. A 2007 JAMA meta-analysis of 68 trials reached a similar conclusion for beta-carotene, vitamin A and vitamin E. These trials tested oral antioxidant supplements and were not trials of orthomolecular programs as a whole.
Psychiatric and developmental conditions
A 2017 systematic review and meta-analysis of 18 randomized trials (832 patients) of vitamin and mineral supplements in schizophrenia found that vitamin B supplementation reduced psychiatric symptoms more than control conditions, with a wide confidence interval and substantial heterogeneity, and no effects on positive or negative symptom domains. It found no overall effect from antioxidant vitamins, inositol or dietary minerals. The authors describe the evidence as preliminary, and the trials used supplements as an adjunct to antipsychotic medication. Only the abstract was read.
For autism, a Cochrane review of combined vitamin B6 and magnesium included three small trials with 33 participants in total and advanced no recommendation because of the small number, quality and size of the studies. A later overview of 17 Cochrane reviews of autism interventions reported that no benefit was found for vitamin B6 with magnesium, among other treatments.
What are the criticisms and limits?
Gaps in the sources reviewed
No free-access copy of the 1970s professional task force reports on megavitamin and orthomolecular therapy in psychiatry could be opened and verified, so their findings are not reported here. Searches of PubMed for megavitamin therapy in ADHD and autism, for the Hoffer and Osmond niacin work, and for a Cochrane review of vitamin therapy in schizophrenia returned no record that could be verified for this page. The sources reviewed also include no professional-body position statement on orthomolecular medicine.
Why findings do not transfer
The reviews summarized here tested specific nutrients, routes and conditions. Results for oral vitamin C in advanced cancer, antioxidant prevention trials and adjunctive B vitamins in schizophrenia do not establish or refute the broader orthomolecular framework, in which individual biochemistry guides choices. Authors of the safety literature make a related point: a 1984 case report states that many claims of benefit for megavitamin therapy have been made but few have been demonstrated in controlled trials, and the 2012 Cochrane authors say antioxidant supplements should be treated as medicinal products and evaluated sufficiently before marketing.
What are the safety considerations?
Niacin and vitamin B6
The NIH Office of Dietary Supplements reports that supplemental nicotinic acid commonly causes skin flushing with burning, tingling and itching. At pharmacologic intakes it can cause more serious effects, including impaired glucose tolerance, gastrointestinal effects, blurred vision with macular edema, raised liver enzymes, hepatitis and liver failure. It says liver toxicity is more likely with extended-release nicotinic acid, and that signs of liver toxicity can also occur with very high nicotinamide intakes.
The same office reports that chronic high oral intake of vitamin B6 can cause severe and progressive sensory neuropathy, including ataxia. It notes that the Food and Nutrition Board cited neuropathy reports at lower intakes in some cases while other studies found none, and that the board set its upper intake level with that uncertainty in mind.
Vitamin A, vitamin C and combined intakes
A 1984 case report describes a man with pancytopenia, severe sensory neuropathy and portal hypertension after six years of excessive vitamin intake, with a liver biopsy showing hypervitaminosis A. A 1988 case report describes benign intracranial hypertension from excess vitamin A in a child with juvenile chronic arthritis, who recovered after it was withdrawn. These are single-patient reports and do not show how often such harm occurs. MedlinePlus notes that fat-soluble vitamins, including vitamin A, can accumulate in the body.
MedlinePlus says very high vitamin C intakes can cause stomach upset and diarrhea and, rarely, kidney stones. The National Cancer Institute reports renal failure in people with preexisting kidney disorders given intravenous vitamin C, hemolysis risk in people with G6PD deficiency, and interference with some blood tests and glucose meters. The Cochrane reviews above also link higher vitamin A doses and beta-carotene or vitamin E with higher mortality in prevention trials. The sources reviewed do not cover iron overload.
Care boundaries
The Linus Pauling Institute describes Pauling as viewing the approach as a complement to standard medical care. Nothing in the sources reviewed supports using high-intake supplements in place of established treatment for cancer, psychiatric illness or other conditions. Anyone with a medical condition, who is pregnant, takes prescribed medicines or has kidney or liver disease should discuss supplements with a qualified clinician, and necessary care should not be delayed or replaced.
Connected Entries
Showing 8 of 15 related records.
Classification and context
- Entry type
- Modality
- Practice type
- Nutrient-based alternative medicine using high-intake vitamins, minerals and amino acids
- Traditions
- Not assigned
- Concepts
- Optimum molecular environment, Orthomolecular psychiatry, Megavitamin therapy, High-dose vitamin C, Individual biochemistry
- Categories
- Alternative
Sources and discovery context
Research and public-health sources support evidence and safety context. Directory and discovery sources describe navigation, relationships, practitioners, and access—not clinical efficacy.
The abstract proposes optimum concentrations of normal brain constituents as a treatment idea for mental illness and offers a hypothesis about schizophrenia.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports what the abstract proposes; must not be read as evidence that orthomolecular therapy is effective.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins, Terminology, Claimed Uses
The biography describes Pauling widening orthomolecular psychiatry into orthomolecular medicine and his belief in vitamin C.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports how an institute named for Pauling describes his orthomolecular work; must not be read as evidence for the claims it reports.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins, Claimed Uses, Safety and Suitability
The society describes nutrient-first care, individual biochemistry and amounts above standard intakes.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports how the movement defines and describes itself; must not be read as independent evidence or as a training standard.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins, Terminology, Practice Description
The page describes a wire-service style feed for news media published by an editorial board.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports the service's self-description only; must not be read as independent evidence.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins
An advocacy release that restates Pauling's definition of orthomolecular medicine.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports the definition attributed to Pauling and the editor listing; must not be used to support any health claim.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins, Terminology, Claimed Uses
A double-blind trial of high-dose oral vitamin C against placebo found no difference in symptoms or survival.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports the finding in selected patients with advanced cancer; must not be applied to intravenous use or other conditions.
- Supports sections
- Research and Evidence
A trial in 100 patients found no advantage of high-dose vitamin C over placebo for progression or survival.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports the finding in patients with advanced colorectal cancer without prior chemotherapy; must not be applied to intravenous use.
- Supports sections
- Research and Evidence
The summary describes mixed phase II results, limited trial rigor and reported renal, hemolytic and test-interference concerns.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports the oral versus intravenous distinction and reported harms; must not be applied to non-cancer uses.
- Supports sections
- Research and Evidence, Safety and Suitability
A review of 78 trials found no support for antioxidant supplements in prevention and signals of higher mortality for some.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports findings for oral antioxidant supplements in prevention trials; must not be read as a review of orthomolecular care as a whole.
- Supports sections
- Claimed Uses, Research and Evidence, Safety and Suitability
A meta-analysis of 68 trials reported higher mortality with beta-carotene, vitamin A and vitamin E and no effect for vitamin C.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports mortality findings for oral antioxidants in prevention trials only.
- Supports sections
- Research and Evidence
A meta-analysis of 18 trials found preliminary evidence for B vitamins and none for antioxidant vitamins, inositol or minerals.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports adjunctive B vitamin findings in schizophrenia; must not be taken as validating megavitamin regimens.
- Supports sections
- Research and Evidence
The review found three small trials and made no recommendation.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports the three-trial finding and the history statement; must not be applied to other conditions or doses.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins, Claimed Uses, Research and Evidence
The overview lists vitamin B6 with magnesium among interventions for which no benefit was found.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports the statement about vitamin B6 with magnesium within an overview of 17 reviews; must not be applied to other vitamins.
- Supports sections
- Research and Evidence
The fact sheet lists flushing and, at pharmacologic intakes, metabolic, ocular and liver effects.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports reported adverse effects of high niacin intakes; must not be read as describing any orthomolecular program.
- Supports sections
- Safety and Suitability
The fact sheet reports severe progressive sensory neuropathy with chronic high oral vitamin B6 intake.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports reported neuropathy with chronic high intake; must not be read as describing any orthomolecular program.
- Supports sections
- Safety and Suitability
A case report of sensory neuropathy, pancytopenia and portal hypertension after six years of excessive vitamin intake.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports a single reported case and the author's comments; no frequency can be inferred.
- Supports sections
- Terminology, Practice Description, Research and Evidence, Safety and Suitability
A case report of intracranial hypertension from excess vitamin A with recovery after withdrawal.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports a single reported case in a child; no frequency can be inferred.
- Supports sections
- Safety and Suitability
A consumer entry noting digestive effects and, rarely, kidney stones with very high intakes.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports the statement on stomach upset, diarrhea and rare kidney stones only.
- Supports sections
- Safety and Suitability
A consumer entry stating that high doses of certain vitamins can be toxic and that fat-soluble vitamins can accumulate.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports the statement that fat-soluble vitamins can accumulate; says nothing about specific doses.
- Supports sections
- Safety and Suitability