Overview
This page covers hypnodontics, also called dental hypnosis: the use of clinical hypnosis by dentists and other dental team members alongside dental care. It describes the history of the term and of dental hypnosis societies, the uses reported for dental anxiety, pain, gagging and bruxism, what systematic reviews and trials show for each use, who delivers it, and why it supplements rather than replaces dental treatment. It belongs to the wider Hypnotherapy family.
Where does Hypnodontics come from?
Mesmerism, surgery and the name hypnosis
The sources reviewed trace hypnosis in medicine to eighteenth-century mesmerism, named for the Austrian physician Franz Anton Mesmer, whose theory of animal magnetism a royal commission in Paris discredited in 1784. A medical-humanities essay reports that the first documented use of mesmerism in surgery came in Paris in 1829, when a surgeon removed a breast tumor while the patient showed no signs of discomfort, and that surgeons in Britain and India, among them James Esdaile, later described operations under mesmeric states.
The same essay states that the Scottish surgeon James Braid supplied the name hypnosis in 1843, and that after ether anesthesia was used in 1846 chemical anesthetics replaced mesmerism in operating theaters by the 1850s. The essay concerns surgery in general and does not describe dental work. The sources reviewed do not identify the first dentist to use hypnosis.
Dental hypnosis societies in the twentieth century
According to the history page of the British Society of Medical and Dental Hypnosis, the idea of a hypnosis society was first raised at a British Dental Association meeting in May 1952 by a dentist, and a committee then formed the British Society of Dental Hypnosis. It became the Dental and Medical Society for the Study of Hypnosis in 1955 as medical practitioners joined, and took its present name in 1968.
The society's account adds that a Scottish branch was founded in 1959 and became an independent society in 1991, and that the national society merged with the British Society of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis in 2004 to form the British Society of Clinical and Academic Hypnosis. This is the society's own history, and no independent history of it was reviewed.
What do the names and terms mean?
Hypnodontics and dental hypnosis
Hypnodontics and dental hypnosis are used for the application of clinical hypnosis in dentistry. A 2016 case report in an endodontic journal uses hypnodontics in its title, while the systematic review by Wolf and colleagues searches under the phrase dental hypnosis. The review's authors describe hypnosis as a state of focused attention and reduced peripheral awareness with an enhanced capacity to respond to suggestion, a definition they attribute to Division 30 of the American Psychological Association.
Wolf and colleagues also report that there is no standard hypnosis therapy for dental use. Trials they reviewed used live hypnosis, audio recordings, relaxation training and combinations with cognitive behavioral therapy, which makes the label cover a range of methods. Suggestibility, also called hypnotizability, and earlier experience of hypnosis are described as additional influences on results.
Relation to other Machipedia pages
Hypnodontics is a member of the family described on the Machipedia page Hypnotherapy, which this page does not duplicate. The page Clinical Hypnosis covers hypnosis delivered by clinicians more generally, and Self-Hypnosis covers practice without a hypnotist. Wolf and colleagues report that audio-recorded self-hypnosis was the most common technique in the dental anxiety trials they reviewed, so the boundary between the two is not sharp in this literature.
What does Hypnodontics involve?
How the literature describes it
Reviewers describe visualization, suggestion and hypnosis strategies as ways to bring a patient to a level of focused attention at which suggestions can be received, with the effect said to depend on how the method is applied and on the empathy of the dentist. Related approaches that appear alongside hypnosis in dental trials include progressive muscle relaxation and guided imagery, which have their own Machipedia page, Guided imagery. A case report describes eye fixation, progressive muscle relaxation and guided imagery over three sessions for a patient with severe gagging.
Where it is used in the dental visit
In the trials reviewed here hypnosis was given before or during treatment and in addition to usual dental care. Children received it during local anesthetic injection, pulpotomy or tooth extraction, and the comparison groups received conventional behavior guidance, relaxation, nitrous oxide or no added intervention. None of the trials replaced the dental procedure or its anesthesia with hypnosis. This page does not describe techniques or scripts.
What is Hypnodontics used for?
Anxiety, phobia and avoidance
Reviewers report that hypnosis is used in dentistry to reduce fear and anxiety, to limit avoidance of dental care and to reduce felt pain. The introduction to a systematic review also cites authors who report less bleeding during extractions and faster wound healing, claims that the review does not itself test.
Pain, gagging and bruxism
The abstract of a review of periodontal care lists uses described in the literature: anesthesia, analgesia, anxiety management, treatment of bruxism, control of gagging, changes in salivary flow and control of bleeding. Beyond that list, the sources reviewed here contain single case reports of hypnosis for severe gagging during root canal treatment and for nocturnal bruxism treated by a psychologist.
What does the research show?
Adults: dental anxiety and phobia
A 2024 review of randomized trials in adults covered 173 trials, 67 of which were pooled in 14 analyses. It reports moderate-certainty evidence for hypnosis in reducing state anxiety during oral surgery (standardized mean difference -0.31, 95% confidence interval -0.56 to -0.05), and stronger support for cognitive behavioral therapy for trait anxiety and for psychotherapy for dental phobia. Only the abstract was read.
A 2022 review of 19 clinical trials published between 1979 and 2021 pooled only five studies, which gave contrasting results. Its authors describe the findings as promising but note studies with small or slightly negative effects, heterogeneous methods, 15 different anxiety measures and the impossibility of double blinding, and call for more consistent methods.
Children and dental injections
A Cochrane review of 26 trials with 2,435 children found that all but one were at high risk of bias, that data could not be pooled, and that evidence was insufficient to name a best approach to increase acceptance of local anesthetic. For hypnosis it found one trial of 29 participants with less pain, rated very low certainty. A network meta-analysis of 61 trials ranked music first for anxiety and hypnosis first for heart rate, and its authors say the limited number of articles requires confirmation.
Individual trials in children vary. A small trial of 30 children reported lower anxiety and pain scores during anesthesia, while another reported only a marginal heart rate difference with no difference in observer-rated scores. Trials of 60 children each reported lower anxiety, pain or analgesic need with hypnosis for pulpotomy and extraction, and a three-arm trial found hypnosis and nitrous oxide similar on several measures.
Gagging, bruxism and limits
A PubMed search for hypnosis with gagging and with bruxism returned case reports and narrative reviews, and the sources reviewed here include no controlled trial for either use. Case reports describe improvement but cannot show cause.
What are the safety considerations?
Reported harms and misconceptions
The Cochrane review notes that none of its included trials reported adverse events as an outcome, and Wolf and colleagues report one trial in which hypnosis neither reduced nor increased anxiety. The sources reviewed do not report serious harms from hypnosis in dental trials, but the absence of reports is not evidence of absence. A survey of 200 patients at one clinic found that 72.5 percent believed a person could become permanently trapped in a hypnotic state, a belief the study treats as a misconception.
Supplement, not substitute
In the evidence reviewed, hypnosis was added to dental care and not used in place of examination, anesthesia or treatment. Reviewers describe cognitive behavioral therapy as having more consistent support for dental phobia, and people with intense fear or avoidance may need assessment by a dentist or mental health professional. Dental pain, swelling or other symptoms need dental assessment regardless of any anxiety support.
Who delivers it
The British Society of Medical and Dental Hypnosis, based in Scotland, offers a certificated course in two weekend modules, open to doctors, dentists, nurses, midwives, dental nurses and psychologists, designed to teach basic hypnosis as a complement to medical and dental practice. The 2026 course fee was 595 pounds. The page describes a basic course and no register, and the sources reviewed did not find a statutory training standard for dentists who use hypnosis. Machipedia pages Biofeedback and Mindfulness cover other non-drug approaches sometimes used for dental anxiety.
Connected Entries
Showing 8 of 73 related records.
Classification and context
- Entry type
- Modality
- Practice type
- Clinical hypnosis applied in dental care
- Traditions
- Mesmerism and Braid, Clinical and academic hypnosis
- Concepts
- Hypnotic induction, Hypnotizability, Suggestion, Focused attention, Attention, Awareness, Mind-Body Connection
- Categories
- Complementary
Sources and discovery context
Research and public-health sources support evidence and safety context. Directory and discovery sources describe navigation, relationships, practitioners, and access—not clinical efficacy.
Open-access review whose authors call the evidence promising but heterogeneous.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Adult studies, 1979-2021, mostly small and heterogeneous; only five used in the meta-analysis. Must not be read as evidence for children, pain or gagging.
- Supports sections
- Terminology, Practice Description, Claimed Uses, Research and Evidence, Safety and Suitability
Large review that compares many anxiety interventions, hypnosis among them.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Adults only; the hypnosis finding concerns state anxiety during oral surgery. Must not be extended to trait anxiety, phobia, children or pain.
- Supports sections
- Research and Evidence
Open-access network meta-analysis that ranks hypnosis highly only for heart rate.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Children aged 4 to 16; ranking of interventions by outcome. Must not be read as showing hypnosis reduces self-reported dental anxiety.
- Supports sections
- Research and Evidence
Cochrane review that found insufficient evidence for any single approach.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Concerns acceptance of local anesthetic injection in people under 18; the hypnosis comparison rests on one small trial. Must not be generalized to other procedures.
- Supports sections
- Research and Evidence, Safety and Suitability
Small trial reporting lower anxiety and pain scores with hypnosis.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Thirty children; anesthesia injection only. Must not be generalized to longer procedures.
- Supports sections
- Research and Evidence
Open-access trial with mostly null results.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Anesthetic infiltration in children; most outcomes did not differ. Must not be read as showing benefit.
- Supports sections
- Research and Evidence
Trial reporting lower observer-rated anxiety and pain with hypnosis.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Sixty children aged 5 to 7 having pulpotomy; scores were observer-rated. Must not be generalized to other ages or procedures.
- Supports sections
- Research and Evidence
Open-access trial comparing hypnosis, relaxation and no intervention.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Sixty children having primary molar extraction. Must not be generalized beyond this setting.
- Supports sections
- Research and Evidence
Open-access three-arm trial against nitrous oxide and conventional guidance.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Sixty-six children with low-to-moderate anxiety having one primary tooth extracted. Must not be generalized to highly anxious children.
- Supports sections
- Research and Evidence
Case report that uses the term hypnodontics for hypnosis in endodontic care.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- One adult patient; a case report cannot show that hypnosis caused the change.
- Supports sections
- Claimed Uses, Research and Evidence
Case study of hypnotherapy for nocturnal bruxism.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- One patient treated by a psychologist, not a dentist; cannot show causation.
- Supports sections
- Claimed Uses, Research and Evidence
Review whose abstract lists uses of hypnosis in dentistry.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- The abstract lists uses described in the literature; it does not test them.
- Supports sections
- Claimed Uses
Survey of patient misconceptions about hypnosis in dentistry.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- A survey of 200 patients at one university prosthodontic clinic in Turkey; reports beliefs, not outcomes.
- Supports sections
- Safety and Suitability
Essay on mesmerism, early surgery and the arrival of ether.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Concerns general surgery, not dentistry.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins
The society's account of its founding among dentists in 1952.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Describes one UK society's origins; not a global history of dental hypnosis.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins, Safety and Suitability
Course page for health professionals including dentists.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Describes one society's basic course; not a national standard or register.
- Supports sections
- Safety and Suitability
Links to Gyfts HypnoDontics page for this practice, for discovery only. The platform's descriptions and claims are not independent claims. Machipedia does not rely on them for evidence.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Links to Gyfts' page for this practice, for discovery only. The platform's descriptions and claims are not independent evidence, and nothing on this Machipedia page relies on them.
- Supports sections
- Practice Description