Overview
This page covers Blue Star Reiki, a name used for a Reiki-derived energy practice that is taught through paid courses, often in graded levels. The sources reviewed do not independently document its founder, founding date or teaching lineage, so the page separates what teachers and course descriptions say from what the Reiki reference sources and research establish. Because the name sits within the Reiki family, the page also summarizes the general Reiki evidence, which is small, low certainty and inconsistent. No study of this specific lineage was found.
Where does Blue Star Reiki come from?
Usui Reiki as the documented reference point
Reiki is generally traced to Mikao Usui, who taught in Japan in the early 1920s. A University of Minnesota wellness resource describes his teaching as dating to that period and says his realization most likely occurred in 1922. The same resource states that Usui trained 16 students as Reiki masters, and that one of them, Chujiro Hayashi, later opened a Reiki clinic in Tokyo. It also says Hawayo Takata brought Reiki to Hawaii in 1937 and that the practice later spread to the US mainland.
The sources opened for this draft do not give an independent biography of Usui, so no biographical dates are stated here. The Minnesota resource also notes that Reiki is now practiced worldwide, although not usually in the traditional form Takata taught. That observation concerns variation between schools, not the reliability of the historical account.
Blue Star as a named lineage
The name Blue Star Reiki does not appear in the Reiki reference sources opened for this draft, and a PubMed search for the name and two closely related labels returned no records. Course listings and teacher pages that use the name were found through web search. None could be used as a source under this page's standards, because they are vendor or teaching promotion rather than independent description. The founder, founding date and first teacher of Blue Star Reiki therefore remain unverified.
Course listings found in the search describe the system as channeled or as tied to non-human sources, and describe multi-level training with additional symbols. Those are attributed claims made by sellers and teachers. They are not established history, and this page does not repeat them as facts. Similarly named groups that appeared in the same searches belong to other traditions and are not treated here as the same lineage.
What do the names and terms mean?
The Reiki family and its labels
Reiki is a Japanese-derived name for a hands-on or near-body energy practice. Many styles and lineages use the name, and they vary in symbols, levels and teaching content. Machipedia places Blue Star Reiki within the Reiki family, with the general Reiki entry covering the shared practice and the Usui-derived lineage described on its own page. The label Blue Star Reiki is not an established term in the reference sources reviewed, so it functions more as the name of a teaching brand than as a documented technique.
Names that resemble it
Readers searching for Blue Star material may encounter names that look similar but refer to different things, including a Wiccan tradition and a mystery school. Labels such as Blue Ray Reiki are also distinct from Blue Star Reiki in the material found. This page does not treat any of these as the same practice, and a reader should check which teacher or organization is meant before drawing conclusions from a course or a claim.
What does Blue Star Reiki involve?
What the Reiki family involves
The National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) describes Reiki as a practice in which practitioners place their hands lightly on or just above a person to support that person's own healing response. NCCIH states that the practice rests on an Eastern belief in an energy that supports natural healing, and that there is no scientific evidence for the energy field it relies on. Descriptions of session format, duration and number of visits vary between schools and are not standardized across the family.
How Blue Star teaching is described
Teachers who use the Blue Star name describe training in graded levels, with symbols and attunements introduced at each level and with claimed access to additional energies. The sources reviewed do not document which symbols, levels or teaching content are used, and no independent description of Blue Star training was opened. A reader comparing it with Usui-style Reiki should expect the stated differences to rest on the teacher's own account.
What is Blue Star Reiki used for?
Uses proposed for Reiki in general
NCCIH reports that Reiki has been studied for pain, anxiety and depression, and that it has not been clearly shown to be effective for any health-related purpose. The same summary describes most of the research as low quality with inconsistent results.
Recent systematic reviews have examined Reiki for symptoms in cancer and palliative care, including fatigue, pain, mood and quality of life. Their authors report some improvements in these outcomes in individual studies, and they describe the certainty of the evidence as low or very low because of small samples and differences in design.
Claims specific to Blue Star Reiki
Claims specific to the Blue Star lineage, such as access to higher-frequency or non-human energies and accelerated spiritual development, appear in teacher and course descriptions. The sources reviewed contain no independent evidence for these claims and no study tested them. They should be read as the teaching community's own account of the practice, not as established findings.
What does the research show?
Controlled trials of general Reiki
A Cochrane review by Joyce and Herbison, with searches to November 2014, found three randomized trials of Reiki in adults with anxiety or depression. Those trials provided data for 25 people with anxiety, 17 with depression and 20 with either condition, and the data were too sparse for pooling. The review found no evidence that Reiki is either beneficial or harmful for these outcomes and concluded that the evidence is insufficient.
A 2025 meta-analysis of randomized trials by Liu and colleagues, with a search cutoff of September 2024, included 661 participants and found a small improvement in quality of life after Reiki (standardized mean difference 0.28, 95% confidence interval 0.01 to 0.56). Its abstract does not report risk-of-bias ratings, so the strength of the pooled result cannot be judged from the abstract alone, and the trials it pooled test general Reiki rather than any named lineage.
Recent reviews in cancer, palliative and surgical care
A 2026 systematic review in palliative care located nine studies with 415 participants, including three randomized trials, and reported that reporting of harms was limited. Its authors judged the certainty of evidence very low and said it precludes firm conclusions about effectiveness. A 2026 review in breast cancer found four studies with 339 participants and described the samples as small and the methods as varied.
A 2017 meta-analysis of randomized trials examined reiki and prayer for pain during hospital stays for cesarean section. It reported a lower pain score in the pooled groups, with high heterogeneity (I squared 92 percent), but the evidence was rated as having a high risk of bias. The abstract pools reiki and prayer together, so the Reiki effect cannot be separated from the prayer comparison in that summary.
Blue Star Reiki specifically
No study of Blue Star Reiki was found. A PubMed search for the name and two related labels returned no records, and the NCCIH summary does not discuss lineages. The trials above tested Reiki as delivered in each study, which may or may not resemble Blue Star teaching, so their results should not be transferred to this lineage.
What are the safety considerations?
Reported harms
NCCIH states that Reiki has not been shown to have any harmful effects. That statement reflects the research reviewed by NCCIH, which is small. The 2026 palliative care review found that reporting of harms was limited, and that only one study monitored adverse events and reported one serious event considered potentially related to the intervention. The breast cancer review describes Reiki as appearing safe and well tolerated in its included studies.
Absence of reported harm in small trials is not the same as evidence of safety. The sources reviewed do not examine harms for Blue Star Reiki, and the reported harms of general Reiki do not establish the risk profile of added symbols, levels or practices that differ from those studied.
Care boundaries and when to seek help
NCCIH notes that its information is not intended to substitute for the expertise and advice of a health care provider and encourages people to discuss decisions about treatment or care with their clinicians. Reiki is not a replacement for medical assessment, for a diagnosis, or for treatment that a clinician has prescribed. Chest pain, fainting, new neurological symptoms or other concerning changes in health warrant prompt medical assessment, whatever complementary practice a person is using.
Training and practitioner standards
No professional body's register, code of ethics or training standard that names Blue Star Reiki was found in the sources searched. This is a finding about the sources searched, not a statement that no such standard exists. Readers considering courses should ask the teacher or organization for their training content, their qualifications and their cancellation terms, and should be cautious where a course promises specific health effects.
Connected Entries
Showing 8 of 20 related records.
Classification and context
- Entry type
- Modality
- Practice type
- Reiki-derived energy practice (hands-on or near-body)
- Traditions
- Reiki family
- Concepts
- Subtle energy, Hand placement, Teacher-led lineage
- Categories
- Complementary, Metaphysical
Sources and discovery context
Research and public-health sources support evidence and safety context. Directory and discovery sources describe navigation, relationships, practitioners, and access—not clinical efficacy.
NCCIH summarizes Reiki research as low quality and inconsistent and reports no harmful effects.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Covers what NCCIH states about Reiki in general: evidence is low quality and inconsistent, no harmful effects reported, and no scientific basis for the energy field. Does not address Blue Star Reiki or any lineage, and must not be read as evidence about any specific condition.
- Supports sections
- Practice Description, Claimed Uses, Research and Evidence, Safety and Suitability
A university wellness resource gives the early 1920s teaching period and Takata's 1937 arrival in Hawaii.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports statements about Usui's teaching in Japan in the early 1920s, the 1922 realization date, Hayashi's clinic and Takata's 1937 arrival in Hawaii. Does not describe any lineage other than these, and must not be used for biographical detail the page does not give.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins, Terminology
The Cochrane authors found three small trials and judged the evidence insufficient for anxiety or depression.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports the statement that three small randomized trials of general Reiki in adults with anxiety or depression gave insufficient evidence, searched to November 2014. Must not be extended to Blue Star Reiki, to other conditions or to later research.
- Supports sections
- Research and Evidence
The meta-analysis pooled 661 participants and reports a small quality-of-life improvement after Reiki.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports a small pooled quality-of-life effect of general Reiki across 661 participants, searched to September 2024. Must not be read as evidence for Blue Star Reiki, for specific diseases or for any dose recommendation.
- Supports sections
- Research and Evidence
The palliative care review reports very low certainty of evidence and limited reporting of harms.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports nine studies (415 participants), limited harms reporting and very low certainty of evidence in palliative settings. Must not be extended to Blue Star Reiki or to Therapeutic Touch alone.
- Supports sections
- Claimed Uses, Research and Evidence, Safety and Suitability
The breast cancer review found four small studies and describes Reiki as appearing well tolerated in them.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports four studies with 339 participants reporting fatigue, comfort and quality-of-life findings, with small samples. Must not be extended to other cancers, to Blue Star Reiki or to safety conclusions beyond the included studies.
- Supports sections
- Claimed Uses, Research and Evidence, Safety and Suitability
The meta-analysis pooled reiki and prayer, and its authors rated the evidence as having a high risk of bias.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports a pooled lower pain score for reiki and prayer during cesarean hospitalization, with high risk of bias and heterogeneity. Must not be read as a separate Reiki effect or as evidence for other pain conditions or for Blue Star Reiki.
- Supports sections
- Research and Evidence
Links to Gyfts Blue Star Reiki page for this practice, for discovery only. The platform's descriptions and claims are not independent claims. Machipedia does not rely on them for evidence.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Links to Gyfts' page for this practice, for discovery only. The platform's descriptions and claims are not independent evidence, and nothing on this Machipedia page relies on them.
- Supports sections
- Practice Description