Overview
This page separates two uses of the word intuition. In psychology, decision research and clinical practice it names rapid judgments studied alongside analytical reasoning. In esoteric and New Age settings it can name a spiritual faculty or inner guidance. It also covers research on anomalous 'sixth sense' claims such as presentiment and precognition. Psychic Reading and related intuitive practices have their own pages.
Where does Intuition come from?
Philosophical and psychological roots of the term
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on Henri Bergson states that in his 1903 Introduction to Metaphysics he presented intuition as a philosophical method. It describes this intuition as a kind of 'sympathy', a direct entering into the thing itself, contrasted with analysis, which divides reality into concepts for practical purposes. This is one early philosophical usage and is not the same as the later psychological sense of a rapid judgment.
In psychology, intuition is commonly discussed within dual-process accounts. Evans and Stanovich (2013) describe rapid autonomous processes (Type 1) that yield default responses unless higher-order reasoning processes (Type 2) intervene, and they note that critics have attacked dual-process theories as a category. A review of general practitioners' reasoning describes the cognitive continuum theory as an early form of dual-process theory and cites work on tacit knowledge and on stages of expertise running from analytical to largely intuitive. The sources reviewed do not give a single dated origin for the dual-process idea.
Decision research and the expertise debate
Kahneman and Klein (2009) compared two research approaches that are often viewed as conflicting, heuristics and biases and naturalistic decision making, and tried to map the boundary conditions that separate skilled intuition from overconfident and biased impressions. Gigerenzer and Gaissmaier (2011) reviewed work on heuristics, mental shortcuts that ignore part of the available information, and report evidence that such shortcuts can be accurate in realistic settings, particularly where predictability is low or samples are small. Dane and Pratt (2007) defined intuitions as 'affectively charged judgments that arise through rapid, nonconscious, and holistic associations' and built a model of intuition in managerial decisions.
Esoteric lineages
Within the esoteric movement founded by Rudolf Steiner (1861-1925), later called anthroposophy, intuition names a stage of cognition. A scholar of religious experience reports that Steiner described stages of development that he termed Imaginative, Inspirational and Intuitive cognition, set out in books such as How to Know Higher Worlds (1904), Theosophy (1904) and An Outline of Esoteric Science (1910). The same article reports that Steiner distanced himself from the trance mediums of the Spiritualist circles of his day. Another scholar dates Steiner's turn to the theosophical movement to 1902.
What do the names and terms mean?
Psychological and clinical meanings
Usage varies even within research. A European expert group on gut feelings in general practice (COGITA) published a glossary of diagnostic reasoning terms because authors risk using different terms for similar concepts; the glossary covers analytical and non-analytical reasoning and intuition. In a review of general practitioners' reasoning, gut feelings are treated as a specific kind of intuitive feeling, defined as thoughts that come to mind without apparent effort, and two types are distinguished: a sense of alarm and a sense of reassurance.
An interview study of 18 family physicians sorted 24 reported intuition cases into three decision-process types, gut feelings, recognitions and insights, and noted that earlier studies had equated clinical intuition with first impressions. A mixed-studies review of nursing research concludes that intuition is more than a gut feeling and describes it as a process based on knowledge and care experience.
Spiritual and esoteric meanings
In the esoteric usage, the meaning can differ sharply from the clinical one. A scholar of Steiner's work reports that, in both his early and later writings, intuition is an unmediated cognitive perception of reality that creates unity on the level of thought or idea, rather than an emotion or gut feeling. The sources reviewed for this page do not define clairsentience or inner guidance, so this page does not define them; popular teaching materials were not used as sources. Psychic Reading and the site's pages on intuitive practices cover how those terms are used in practice.
Related terms in research on anomalous cognition
Bem (2011) defines psi as anomalous processes of information or energy transfer currently unexplained by known physical or biological mechanisms. He separates precognition, a conscious cognitive awareness of a future event, from premonition, an affective apprehension of it. Researchers of presentiment use a different framing: physiological changes recorded before a stimulus that the participant could not predict. These terms describe claimed responses to future events and are distinct from the experience-based intuition studied in decision research.
How is Intuition applied in practice?
Use of the idea in professional decision-making
Dane and Pratt propose that the effectiveness of intuition depends on domain knowledge, implicit and explicit learning, and task characteristics. In clinical settings, the nursing review (16 studies, published 1985-2016) groups its findings under the characteristics of intuition in daily work, its role in relationships with patients, and its role in the nursing process, including support and guidance, clues in decision-making and validating decisions. The review authors conclude that nurses use intuition alongside objective data.
In general practice, a review proposes that a sense of alarm should prompt a clinician to slow down and switch to analytical reasoning, and it suggests that medical education could give trainees opportunities to discuss the role of gut feelings in their reasoning. These are proposals by the authors, not tested training programs.
Use of the idea in esoteric and philosophical systems
Adherents of Steiner's system describe a path of development that begins with study of spiritual-scientific works and disciplined thinking before progressing through Imaginative and Inspirational to Intuitive cognition. A scholar of Steiner's philosophy reports that, in The Philosophy of Freedom, intuition is the means by which a person arrives at the concepts that connect percepts, and that moral intuition underlies ethical conduct in its highest form. Bergson's method, as summarized above, asks for effort over several acts rather than a passing impression.
The sources reviewed do not describe how contemporary psychic readers, intuitive development classes or inner-guidance teachers use the term. That material is left to the pages on those practices.
What is Intuition used for?
Claims in decision-making and clinical settings
Researchers describe several claimed roles. Gigerenzer and Gaissmaier report that simple heuristics can be accurate in realistic conditions. Dane and Pratt model when intuition may contribute to managerial decisions. General practitioners in the reviewed literature describe a sense of alarm and a sense of reassurance as aids when diagnosis is uncertain, and the authors of the nursing review conclude that intuition supports decision-making and the safety of patient care. These are authors' conclusions drawn from review or interview material, not outcome trials.
Claims in esoteric traditions
In Steiner's system, as reported by a scholar of religious experience, a spiritual science could reach objective facts about the spiritual world solely through the powers of human cognition, and Intuitive cognition forms one of its higher stages. A second scholar describes Steiner's moral intuition as the source of right action in a given situation. Contemporary claims that intuition offers guidance on relationships, careers or health are widespread in popular teaching, but the sources reviewed do not document or test them.
What does the research show?
Expertise and the conditions for reliable intuition
Kahneman and Klein concluded that the likely quality of an intuitive judgment depends on how predictable the environment is and on whether the individual has had the opportunity to learn its regularities, and that subjective experience is not a reliable indicator of judgment accuracy. Evans and Stanovich defend the dual-process distinction against critics, while agreeing that some criticisms have force against some versions of the theories.
Studies of clinicians mostly describe how intuition is experienced rather than how accurate it is. In the family physician interviews, every reported case involved a judgment that conflicted with a more rational explanation or with what colleagues would do, and the authors state that little is known about what determines the success or failure of different intuitive processes. The general practice review likewise lists the diagnostic value of gut feelings as a question for further research.
Presentiment, precognition and the replication record
Bem (2011) reported nine experiments with more than 1,000 participants, testing time-reversed versions of established psychological effects, and a mean effect size of 0.22. Wagenmakers and colleagues reanalyzed the data with a Bayesian test and reported that evidence for psi was weak to nonexistent; Bem, Utts and Johnson replied that the prior used was unrealistic and that a more reasonable prior yields strong evidence. The statistical disagreement is a matter of method and was not resolved in these papers.
Replication attempts of the retroactive recall experiments have mostly been negative. Three pre-registered attempts with 150 participants combined produced a one-tailed p of .83. A later set of seven experiments (N = 3,289) failed to replicate the finding, and a meta-analysis of replication attempts found an average effect size of 0.04.
A separate line of work on physiological anticipation before unpredictable stimuli is described differently. A meta-analysis of 26 reports (1978-2010) found a small overall effect (0.21); its authors argue the cause lies within natural physical processes rather than paranormal ones and call for replication by independent laboratories. An update that added 19 studies reports an overall effect of 0.28 and a publication-bias model that does not suggest contamination. These findings concern unconscious physiological responses, not conscious intuition, and their interpretation remains contested.
What the searches did not find
Searches of PubMed for controlled trials of intuition training and for controlled accuracy studies of psychic or medical-intuitive readings did not surface a study of spiritual intuition-development programs that this review could identify, though the records returned were not exhaustively screened. The esoteric sources cited here are interpretive scholarship on Steiner's thought, and their authors do not test whether intuitive or clairvoyant perceptions are accurate.
What are the safety considerations?
Reliance on intuition in high-stakes decisions
The expertise literature supports caution about how confident an intuitive impression feels. Kahneman and Klein state that subjective experience is not a reliable indicator of judgment accuracy. The review of general practitioners' reasoning notes that the medical decision-making literature warns that intuitive hunches may be false, that ideas that first spring to mind can shape later thinking, and that confirming evidence may be sought selectively.
The same review suggests that a sense of alarm should lead a clinician to slow down and use analytical reasoning, and it reports that instructions to combine analytical and non-analytical reasoning have been associated with improved diagnostic accuracy. The family physician study cautions against reading its findings as evidence that clinicians should trust intuition without checking.
Health choices and care boundaries
The sources reviewed describe clinicians' and managers' judgments, not lay people's use of intuition to choose health care. None reports harms from spiritual intuition practices, and none evaluates them. Given the replication results above, the research reviewed provides no support for treating a felt premonition as dependable information about the future. Intuitive impressions are not a substitute for professional assessment, and they should not delay or replace necessary medical, psychological or safety care.
No professional register, protected title or training standard for intuition as such was identified in the sources reviewed. Requirements for particular practices, such as psychic readings, vary and are covered on their own pages.
Connected Entries
Showing 8 of 10 related records.
Classification and context
- Entry type
- Concept
- Practice type
- Concept: judgment or knowing reached without deliberate step-by-step reasoning
- Traditions
- Decision research and cognitive psychology, Clinical practice (nursing and family medicine), Anthroposophy, Philosophy (Henri Bergson), Contemporary psychic and New Age teaching
- Concepts
- Dual-process theory, Heuristics, Naturalistic decision making, Tacit knowledge, Gut feelings, Precognition, Presentiment, Clairsentience, Inner guidance
- Categories
- Metaphysical, Holistic
Sources and discovery context
Research and public-health sources support evidence and safety context. Directory and discovery sources describe navigation, relationships, practitioners, and access—not clinical efficacy.
A reference entry summarizing intuition as a method that contrasts with analysis.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports Bergson's philosophical use of intuition only. Must not be inferred to describe psychological or psychic intuition.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins, Practice Description
A defence of dual-process theories that acknowledges some criticisms apply to some versions.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports the Type 1 / Type 2 account and the existence of criticism. Does not assess intuition accuracy.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins, Research and Evidence
A joint paper by proponents of two approaches that maps when professional intuition can be trusted.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports statements in the abstract only (predictability, opportunity to learn, subjective experience not a reliable indicator). Details of the argument were not read.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins, Research and Evidence, Safety and Suitability
A review reporting that simple heuristics can match or beat more complex methods under some conditions.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports the general statement from the abstract. Does not address spiritual intuition.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins, Claimed Uses
A conceptual model of when intuition is effective in managerial decisions.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports the definition quoted and the factors in the proposed model. Does not report empirical effect sizes.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins, Practice Description, Claimed Uses
A narrative review that proposes gut feelings as a third track alongside analytical diagnostic reasoning.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- A narrative review and proposed model, not a trial. Must not be read as showing gut feelings are accurate.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins, Terminology, Practice Description, Claimed Uses, Research and Evidence, Safety and Suitability
An interview study that classified reported intuition cases and called for research on accuracy.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- 18 physicians, 24 cases, self-reported. Does not measure accuracy.
- Supports sections
- Terminology, Research and Evidence, Safety and Suitability
A review of nursing research that characterizes intuition in clinical work.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- 16 studies (1985-2016). The authors' safety conclusions are interpretive; the abstract reports no accuracy outcomes.
- Supports sections
- Terminology, Practice Description, Claimed Uses
A consensus glossary created by researchers because terms for similar concepts differ.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Supports the existence of a consensus glossary and its coverage only.
- Supports sections
- Terminology
The original report of the nine time-reversed experiments that prompted replication attempts.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Nine experiments, more than 1,000 participants, as reported by the author. Not a randomized clinical trial; the classification is the closest available.
- Supports sections
- Terminology, Research and Evidence
A Bayesian reanalysis of the data in the original experiments.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- A statistical critique reporting weak to nonexistent Bayesian evidence. Not a replication.
- Supports sections
- Research and Evidence
A reply arguing that the prior used in the reanalysis was unrealistic.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Authors' argument about the prior distribution only. The authors are the original investigator and colleagues.
- Supports sections
- Research and Evidence
Three independent pre-registered replications that found no significant effect.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Covers one experiment (retroactive facilitation of recall) only. Not a test of all precognition claims.
- Supports sections
- Research and Evidence, Safety and Suitability
Seven replications and a meta-analysis giving an average effect size of 0.04.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Seven experiments (N = 3,289) on the recall procedure and a meta-analysis of replications of those experiments. Not a test of all psi claims.
- Supports sections
- Research and Evidence, Safety and Suitability
A meta-analysis reporting a small unexplained anticipatory effect and calling for replication.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- 26 reports, 1978-2010; physiological anticipation, not conscious intuition. Does not establish a mechanism.
- Supports sections
- Terminology, Research and Evidence
An update adding studies from 2008 to 2018 and reporting an overall effect of 0.28.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Reports its own effect size and publication-bias model. Independent evaluation was not located.
- Supports sections
- Research and Evidence
A scholarly article analyzing continuity in Steiner's thought and the role of intuition in it.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- Describes what Steiner taught. Does not test or endorse his claims, and does not cover other esoteric traditions or contemporary psychic practice.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins, Terminology, Practice Description, Claimed Uses, Research and Evidence, Safety and Suitability
A religious studies paper that interprets Steiner's higher modes of cognition through consciousness theory.
How this source relates
- Source link
- Exact source page
- Relationship
- The author's own thesis (mystical experience as neurophysiological events) is a contested interpretation and is not endorsed here.
- Supports sections
- History and Origins, Practice Description, Claimed Uses, Research and Evidence